You've seen them mocked in the pages of Dilbert. You've seen them criticized on the Simpsons, and unable to understand thanks to Enron and World-Com. All that said, I've got a shocker for you: Mission Statements can actually be worthwhile.

        I will explain.

        In his book On What Leaders Really Do, author John P. Kotter points out that leaders do three fundamental things: They create a common culture, create a shared vision, and they inspire. Mission statements, then, are simply a method of communicating that vision to an entire department or company.

        Think that isn't important? Imagine if a manager at Marshall Fields or Cadillac tried to compete, head-to-head against wall-mart or Kia based on price. The company would fail - plain and simple. Luckily, both of those companies have a vision and culture that is crystal clear: only a fool could mis-understand them. (In the same vein, Wal-Mart and Kia don't try to charge a premium price, because it's in direct contrast to the companies strategy.)

        The thing about software companies, especially new ones, is that they don't have the established reputation that these old-line retailers do. The company may have products or services to sell, but on a nearly dailey basis, a manager is going to get tasked with deciding "do we do this or that?"

        The company could just make it's decision ad-hoc - in which case there is no strategy. It could have a single decision maker/super-guru that creates a single vision, but, as the company grows, eventually, it's going to have to communicate it's plan.

        That's where the mission statement comes in.


        I will give a few examples:

        Good Vision #1:
"DataAnyWhere, Inc. provides data conversion, manipulation, and reporting tools for small and medium (<500 employees) while building a generic toolset, which may eventually become a commercial application." DataAnyWhere, Inc. will focus on accurate software that ships on-time and under-budget."

        Good Vision #2:
"eMallOnline provides complete e-commerce solutions for small businesses. eMallOnline software developers use eMallOnline's shopping mall software to create web-pages that are hosted on the server, and customers enter products through eMallOnline's stock-entry browser software. Customers may also fund customization, which is rolled into the eMallOnline.com Shopping Mall Software. Because of the customer, YCo focuses on cost-effective, all-in-one solutions that are competitivly priced.

        A Terrible Vision
"Synergistic StuffWare is a world-class client-services organization that specializes in developing low-cost solutions that ship on-time, under-budget, complete, high quality, while maximizing shareholder value, customer satisfaction, and employee morale."



        See the difference here? Let's say the company is bidding on a project that is high-risk. A DataAnyWhere project manager might charge extra for the risk, because low-cost isn't part of the vision, but on-time and under-budget is. An eMallOnline project manager might pass up on the project, because the low-bid nature of the company doesn't work when over-runs are possible. A company Synergistic StuffWare project manager has no guidance at all from the mission statement.

        In the same sense, when offered a choice between a web project and an data-mining project, the DataAnyWhere and eMallOnline managers know what to do. The Synergistic manager has no guidance at all from the mission statement. In fact, most of the missions of Synergistic are conflicts of interest! Low-Cost solutions are generally not profitable. What about when the project is late and the developers are putting in overtime that is unhealthy? Does the Synergistic project manager send them home? He doesn't know

        In fact, often, software is a tradeoff between time, money, features, and quality. When writing the mission statement, Synergistic's management refused to prioritize the four, and also refused to create a meaningful stategy. The results are predictable: Management of Synergistic will not be able to make consistent decisions, and certainly won't build a common culture, shared vision, or inspire anyone.

        Synergistic StuffWare is in trouble. Don't let Synergistic StuffWare be you.